- 12 -
effect which directed that, for each 28-day period during the
year (excluding the summer when certain of the children attended
camp), the children were to spend 18 days with Mr. Krasner and 10
days with petitioner. Despite the custodial order, starting
around 2001 the oldest child (S) chose to live all the time with
Mr. Krasner. That child became emancipated around 2001 and as of
the time of the trial in this case still lived with Mr. Krasner
and attended college. In addition, despite the custodial order,
starting around 2003 the second oldest child (C) chose to live
all the time with Mr. Krasner, which she continued to do as of
the time of the trial in this case.
From December 18, 1999, through February 11, 2001, peti-
tioner telephoned the police department of Haverford Township,
Pennsylvania (Haverford police department) five times to report
certain alleged incidents involving Mr. Krasner. Upon each of
those occasions, the Haverford police department dispatched an
officer to petitioner’s residence to investigate petitioner’s
claims, and that officer prepared a so-called incident report
(incident report). All of the incident reports indicated that
some type of domestic dispute occurred between petitioner and Mr.
Krasner relating to custodial issues and/or the division of the
marital assets. For example, an incident report prepared by an
officer of the Haverford police department on August 23, 2000,
stated in pertinent part:
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011