Janet H. Krasner, Petitioner, and Paul Krasner , Intervenor - Page 58

                                       - 58 -                                         
          submissions that she made to the IRS after she filed that form.30           
          Moreover, petitioner had no hesitation in allowing the children             
          to stay with Mr. Krasner during virtually all of the trips that             
          she took alone during 1999.  Nor did petitioner have any hesita-            
          tion in allowing the children to stay with Mr. Krasner pursuant             
          to the custodial order that was in effect at most relevant times            
          after she and Mr. Krasner legally separated on October 13, 1999,            
          under which, for each 28-day period during the year (excluding              
          the summer when certain of the children attended camp), the                 
          children were to spend 18 days with Mr. Krasner.  If petitioner’s           
          claim that Mr. Krasner “abused drugs and alcohol, which resulted            
          in aberrant behavior” were true, we do not believe that she would           
          have left the children with Mr. Krasner during virtually all of             
          the trips that petitioner took alone during 1999, and we believe            
          that she would have asked the Montgomery County Court of Common             
          Pleas to modify the custodial order so that the children were not           
          in Mr. Krasner’s custody for 18 out of each 28-day period during            
          the year (except the summer).  Furthermore, petitioner had no               
          hesitation in making complaints about Mr. Krasner to the                    
          Haverford police department.  If petitioner’s claim that Mr.                
          Krasner “abused drugs and alcohol, which resulted in aberrant               
          behavior and his abusive treatment of her” were true, we believe            

               30In response to a question in petitioner’s Form 886-A                 
          asking whether petitioner was subject to any marital abuse during           
          1998, petitioner stated:  “See Report”.  Petitioner did not                 
          attach any report to petitioner’s Form 886-A.                               




Page:  Previous  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011