- 9 - addressed the issues raised by petitioner. Furthermore, the record demonstrates that Settlement Officer Munson properly verified that all applicable laws and administrative procedures were followed and balanced the need for the efficient collection of taxes with the concern that the collection action be no more intrusive than necessary. On the basis of the foregoing, we hold that the determination of respondent’s Appeals Office to proceed with the collection of petitioners’ tax liabilities for 1994 was not an abuse of discretion. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: May 25, 2011