Richard A. and Elaine C. Murray - Page 6

                                        - 5 -                                         
               At trial, Mr. Murray eventually resorted to quoting the                
          Fourth Amendment and demanding that the Court force respondent to           
          “reveal his sources” and admit the IRS “is shielding and                    
          protecting and encouraging people to be blackmailers”.                      
          Petitioners went as far as to allege that “the IRS is probably              
          paying off the blackmailer * * * the IRS is guilty of obstruction           
          of justice because they’re harboring a blackmailer”.                        
               The Court declines to attach any validity to petitioners’              
          allegations insofar as this case is concerned.  Petitioners                 
          conceded most of respondent’s disallowances and agreed to                   
          adjustments on the remaining items.  That fact indicates that               
          respondent had an appropriate reason to make the determination              
          reflected in the notice of deficiency.  Whether the IRS received            
          a “tip” about Mr. Chavez’s fraudulent practice is immaterial in             
          this proceeding.  Adjustments were made to petitioners’ return,             
          and the fact that petitioners conceded these adjustments gives              
          credence to the audit.                                                      
               Inasmuch as petitioners have not shown that respondent’s               
          deficiency determination was arbitrary or erroneous, or that the            
          determination was not supported by the proper foundation, it is             
          inappropriate for this Court to look behind the deficiency notice           
          to examine the basis for, or reasons behind, respondent’s                   
          determination.  Weimerskirch v. Commissioner, 596 F.2d 358, 362             
          (9th Cir. 1979), revg. 67 T.C. 672 (1977); DeBoer v.                        






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011