- 16 - totaling $620,000, has a value between $850,000 and $950,000. Petitioner also testified that she placed the New York property on the market for $82,000 during the summer and fall of 2001, but she did not receive any firm offers. Petitioner claims that her net worth is approximately $50,000. Petitioner did not produce bank records, property tax assessments, real estate appraisals, the listing agreement for the New York property, or any other evidence to support her testimony. Neither Mr. Sturges nor any representative from Paine Webber or Cisco testified at the trial. The only record from Paine Webber is a one-page statement for August 2001 that shows petitioner and Mr. Sturges having an account with a value of $13,439.34. Petitioner offered no evidence other than her own testimony that (1) there is only $15,000 remaining in the charitable remainder trust, (2) monthly expenses exceed Mr. Sturges’s monthly income by $3,500, (3) petitioner and Mr. Sturges’s residence has a value of less than $950,000, (4) the unencumbered New York house has a value of less than $82,000, and (4) the land in Colorado has a value of $20,000. In the absence of corroborating evidence, we are not required to accept, and do not accept, petitioner’s self-serving testimony. See Tokarski v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 74, 77 (1986). Consequently, we conclude that petitioner has failed to carry her burden of proving that requiring her to pay thePage: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011