Bernhard F. and Cynthia G. Manko - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          agreement.  In January 2003, petitioners terminated their special           
          consent to extend the time for respondent to assess tax for the             
          years at issue.  Respondent has never issued petitioners a                  
          deficiency notice for the years at issue, and petitioners never             
          executed a formal waiver of the restrictions on assessment.                 
               Respondent sent petitioners a Final Notice of Intent to Levy           
          and Your Right to a Hearing with respect to the years at issue,             
          and petitioners timely requested a hearing.  Petitioners asserted           
          in their request for a hearing that the proposed levy should not            
          proceed for a variety of reasons.  These reasons included that              
          petitioners had never received a deficiency notice, that                    
          petitioners had made payments toward the liabilities for the                
          years at issue, and that petitioners had an increased net                   
          operating loss for a prior year that would decrease their                   
          liability for the years at issue.  The parties then held a                  
          hearing.  Respondent issued petitioners a notice of determination           
          on December 1, 2004 (the determination notice), which sustained             
          the proposed levy for the years at issue.  The determination                
          notice stated that petitioners had not raised challenges to the             
          existence or amount of the underlying tax liability.  The                   
          determination notice concluded that the assessments for the years           
          at issue should not be abated, briefly citing legal opinions in             
          the case file.                                                              
               Petitioners timely filed a petition with this Court.                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011