Gregory T. Mays and Nadine King-Mays - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          Id.                                                                         
               The problem for the Mayses is that they had already been               
          sent CDP Notices that warned them of NFTLs for 2000 and 2002 back           
          on August 20, 2003.  This was well before November 2, 2003, when            
          they requested a CDP hearing on the NILs.  The regulation                   
          dictates the result:                                                        
                    Where the taxpayer previously received a CDP                      
                    Notice under section 6320 [i.e., a NFTL] with                     
                    respect to the same tax and tax period and                        
                    did not request a CDP hearing with respect to                     
                    that earlier CDP Notice, the taxpayer already                     
                    had an opportunity to dispute the existence                       
                    or amount of the underlying tax liability.                        
          Sec. 301.6330-1(e)(3), A-E7, Proced. & Admin. Regs.  By not                 
          timely requesting a CDP hearing after receiving the NFTLs for               
          2000 and 2002, they lost their right to challenge their tax                 
          liability for those years after receiving the NILs.                         


                                             An appropriate order in favor            
                                        of respondent will be entered.                

















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  

Last modified: May 25, 2011