- 3 - After consideration of the record herein, the briefs of the parties, petitioners’ objections to the Special Trial Judge’s recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law, and respondent’s reply thereto, we conclude that the recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law of Special Trial Judge Carluzzo, which are hereinafter set forth as modified in a number of minor respects, should be adopted as the report of the Court. In a notice of deficiency dated November 15, 1991, respondent determined deficiencies in and additions to the Federal income taxes of petitioner, as follows: Additions to Tax Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Years Deficiencies6653(b)(1) 6653(b)(1)(A) 6653(b)(1)(B) 6653(b)(2) 6661 1985 $329,911 $164,956 ---- ---- 50% of Int. $82,478 due on $305,762 1986 90,590 ---- $52,226 50% of Int. ---- 17,409 due on $69,635 In a separate notice of deficiency, also dated November 15, 1991, respondent determined deficiencies of $329,911 and $90,590 in Martha McHan’s respective 1985 and 1986 Federal income taxes, which deficiencies are based solely on Martha’s alleged joint liability under section 6013 for the tax deficiencies determined against petitioner. After settlement of some issues, the primary issues for decision are: (1) Whether petitioners on their 1985, 1986, and 1987 joint Federal income tax returns underreported petitioner’sPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011