Charles McHan and Martha McHan - Page 23

                                       - 23 -                                         
          United States, supra at 499; Douge v. Commissioner, 899 F.2d 164,           
          168 (2d Cir. 1990); Bradford v. Commissioner, 796 F.2d 303, 307-            
          308 (9th Cir. 1986), affg. T.C. Memo. 1984-601; Recklitis v.                
          Commissioner, supra at 910.                                                 
               Often, a combination of factors may provide persuasive                 
          evidence of fraud.  Solomon v. Commissioner, 732 F.2d 1459, 1461            
          (6th Cir. 1984), affg. per curiam T.C. Memo. 1982-603.  A                   
          taxpayer’s intelligence, education, and tax expertise also may be           
          relevant for purposes of determining fraudulent intent.                     
          Stephenson v. Commissioner, supra at 1006; Iley v. Commissioner,            
          19 T.C. 631, 635 (1952).                                                    
               We acknowledge that the facts and evidence in the trial                
          record in this case as to the precise amount of total costs                 
          incurred, sales proceeds, and profit petitioner realized in each            
          year from his illegal drug sales are not established with a great           
          deal of clarity.  Respondent relies heavily on the testimony of             
          convicted felons and on grand jury testimony admitted at                    
          petitioner’s criminal trial.                                                
               However, to find civil tax fraud, the exact amount of income           
          underreported by a taxpayer need not be established.  It is                 
          sufficient that respondent establish, by clear and convincing               
          evidence, that petitioners failed to report substantial income              
          for each year and did so intentionally, at which point the burden           
          of proof shifts to the taxpayer to prove the amount of any                  






Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011