Robert J. Merlo - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
          172(b)(1)(A). Section 172(c) defines an NOL as “the excess of               
          the deductions allowed by this chapter over the gross income,” as           
          modified under section 172(d).  In the case of a noncorporate               
          taxpayer, the amount deductible on account of capital losses                
          shall not exceed the amount includable on account of capital                
          gains.  Sec. 172(d)(2)(A); sec. 1.172-3(a)(2), Income Tax Regs.             
          The effect of section 172(d)(2)(A) is that net capital losses are           
          excluded from the NOL computation.  See Parekh v. Commissioner,             
          T.C. Memo. 1998-151.                                                        
               For AMT purposes, section 56(a)(4) provides that an ATNOL              
          deduction shall be allowed in lieu of an NOL deduction under                
          section 172.  An ATNOL deduction is defined as the NOL deduction            
          allowable under section 172 and is computed by taking into                  
          consideration all the adjustments to taxable income under                   
          sections 56 and 58 and all the preference items under section 57            
          (but only to the extent that the preference items increased the             
          NOL for the year for regular tax purposes).12  Sec. 56(d)(1).               
               Petitioner’s net regular capital loss is excluded from                 
          computing his NOL deduction.  See sec. 172(c), (d)(2)(A); sec.              
          1.172-3(a)(2), Income Tax Regs.  For AMT purposes, petitioner’s             


               11(...continued)                                                       
          because we conclude infra that petitioner is not entitled to an             
          ATNOL, petitioner’s argument is moot.                                       
               12  Sec. 56(d)(1)(A) also limits the amount of the allowable           
          ATNOL deduction; this is not in issue.                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011