- 3 - Petitioner timely petitioned this Court for redetermination based on respondent’s notice of deficiency. Respondent filed an answer with this Court. Petitioner submitted a qualified settlement offer to respondent in which petitioner offered to settle the case for an increase in petitioner’s income tax liability for 1999 in the amount of $100 and for an increase in petitioner’s income tax liability for 2000 in the amount of $117. Respondent did not accept this qualified offer. The issues for decision in Morrison were: (1) Whether payments made on behalf of petitioner or disbursements directly to petitioner by Caspian Consulting Group, Inc.3 (Caspian), during 1999 and personal charges petitioner made on a company credit card in 2000 were constructive dividends; and (2) whether petitioner was liable for an accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) for 1999. On March 23, 2005, this Court filed a memorandum opinion finding for petitioner, that the 1999 payments and disbursements and the 2000 personal charges were loans and not constructive dividends. Therefore, there were no deficiencies in tax for petitioner for the years 1999 and 2000 except for the item 3 Petitioner owned 40 percent of the outstanding stock of Caspian Consulting Group, Inc., a C corporation.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011