Warren L. Owens - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
               A notice of deficiency for 1991 was thereafter issued to               
          petitioner and was sent by certified mail to 12079 Plainview,               
          Detroit, MI 48228-1070792, on December 1, 1998.  The notice                 
          reflected an income tax deficiency in the amount of $8,329.10 for           
          1991 and additions to tax under sections 6651(a) and 6654(a) of             
          $877.53 and $169.99, respectively.  Petitioner did not file a               
          petition with this Court in response to the notice of deficiency,           
          and respondent assessed the corresponding taxes, additions to               
          tax, and interest for 1991 on June 21, 1999.  A notice of balance           
          due was sent to petitioner on that date, as well as on July 26,             
          1999, and September 24, 2001.                                               
               On September 18, 2002, the IRS issued to petitioner a Final            
          Notice - Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a             
          Hearing with respect to his 1991 liabilities.  The notice was               
          sent by certified mail to an address in Romulus, Michigan.  In              
          response, petitioner submitted to the IRS a timely Form 12153,              
          Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing, expressing his                
          disagreement as follows:  “I have filed 1991 return your computer           
          is not correct”.                                                            
               A face-to-face hearing between petitioner and the settlement           
          officer to whom his case had been assigned was held on March 10,            
          2004.  Following the hearing, on May 21, 2004, the aforementioned           
          determination letter sustaining the proposed levy action was                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011