- 5 - Petitioner testified that, in 2003, DP and EW spent weekends and summer vacation with him. This amounts to less than one-half of the taxable year. Therefore, DP and EW fail to meet the residence requirement under section 32(c)(3)(A)(ii) and are not qualifying children for purposes of claiming the earned income credit. Although petitioner is not eligible to claim an earned income credit under section 32(c)(1)(A)(i) for a qualifying child, he may be an “eligible individual” under section 32(c)(1)(A)(ii) even if he does not have any qualifying children. For 2003, a taxpayer is eligible under this section only if his adjusted gross income was less than $11,230. Rev. Proc. 2002-70, sec. 3.06, 2002-2 C.B. 845, 847. Petitioner’s adjusted gross income was $15,662. Accordingly, petitioner is not eligible for an earned income credit. Respondent’s determination on this issue is sustained. Child Tax Credit and Additional Child Tax Credit For 2003, petitioner claimed a child tax credit of $176 and an additional child tax credit of $337 with DP and EW as the qualifying children. Respondent determined that petitioner is not entitled to either credit. Section 24(a) authorizes a child tax credit with respect to each qualifying child of the taxpayer. The term “qualifying child” is defined in section 24(c). A “qualifying child” means an individual with respect to whom the taxpayer is allowed aPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011