Geraldine Ann Peck - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
          to section 7491(a), the burden of proof as to factual matters               
          shifts to respondent under certain circumstances.  Petitioner has           
          neither alleged that section 7491(a) applies nor established her            
          compliance with the requirements of section 7491(a)(2)(A) and (B)           
          to substantiate items, maintain records, and cooperate fully with           
          respondent’s reasonable requests.  Petitioner therefore bears the           
          burden of proof.                                                            
               A taxpayer’s gross income includes all income from whatever            
          source derived unless excluded by a specific provision of the               
          Internal Revenue Code.  Sec. 61(a).  Gross income does not                  
          include “the amount of any damages (other than punitive damages)            
          received (whether by suit or agreement and whether as lump sums             
          or as periodic payments) on account of personal physical injuries           
          or physical sickness”.  Sec. 104(a)(2).  To qualify for this                
          exclusion, the taxpayer must demonstrate:  (1) The underlying               
          cause of action giving rise to the recovery is based upon tort or           
          tort type rights; and (2) the damages were received on account of           
          personal physical injuries or physical sickness.  Commissioner v.           
          Schleier, 515 U.S. 323, 337 (1995); Allum v. Commissioner, T.C.             
          Memo. 2005-177.  The terms “physical injury” and “physical                  
          sickness” do not include emotional distress, except to the extent           
          of damages not in excess of the amount paid for medical care                
          attributable to emotional distress.  Sec. 104(a) (flush                     
          language); see also Prasil v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-100.            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011