Omar Urbina Pineda - Page 10

                                        - 9 -                                         
          E.  Notice of Determination                                                 
               On January 19, 2005, respondent’s Appeals Office issued to             
          petitioner a notice of determination with respect to petitioner’s           
          outstanding liabilities for the years in issue.  In the notice of           
          determination, respondent sustained the proposed levy because               
          petitioner “failed to provide financial information requested.”             
          F.  Petition                                                                
               On February 17, 2005, petitioner filed with the Court a                
          petition under section 6330(d) disputing respondent’s                       
          determination.  Paragraph 4 of the petition states:                         
               I am petitioning the US Tax Court for relief of all                    
               accrued interest for 12/1999 & 12/2001 tax periods.  On                
               02/13/03, I submitted a “Request For A Collection Due                  
               Process Hearing” Form 12153, for 12/1999, 12/2000, &                   
               12/2001 tax periods.  I did not hear from the IRS                      
               appeals office until 07/04, 17 months from the time I                  
               first filed Form 12153.  As a result of this unfair                    
               delay, the IRS appeals office caused the IRS to accrued                
               [sic] additional interest on my 12/1999 & 12/2001 tax                  
               returns.  Finally, the IRS appeals office mismanaged my                
               collection due process.                                                
                                     Discussion                                       
               Section 6330 generally provides that the Commissioner cannot           
          proceed with the collection by levy on a taxpayer’s property                
          until the taxpayer has been given notice of, and the opportunity            
          for, an administrative review of the matter (in the form of an              
          Appeals Office hearing) and, if dissatisfied, with judicial                 
          review of the administrative determination.  See Davis v.                   







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011