PK Ventures, Inc. and Subsidiaries, et al. - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          PK Ventures, in 1987 to enable them to purchase Zephyr Rock &               
          Lime, Inc. (Zephyr), was a bona fide loan and, if so, whether               
          that debt ever became worthless (Issue #1);                                 
               (2) whether transfers of funds from PK Ventures and/or its             
          subsidiaries to PKVI LP prior to and during 1990 and during 1991            
          were bona fide loans and, if so, whether such debts ever became             
          worthless (Issue #2);                                                       
               (3) whether transfers of funds from PK Ventures and two of             
          its subsidiaries to Zephyr prior to 1990 were bona fide loans               
          and, if so, whether such debts ever became worthless (Issue #3);            
               (4) whether PK Ventures had sufficient basis in its PKVI LP            
          interest during 1990, 1991, 1992, and 1993 to deduct the losses             
          that it claimed from PKVI LP on PKV&S’s consolidated Federal                
          income tax returns for those years (Issue #4);                              
               (5) whether the Roses had sufficient basis in their PKVI LP            
          interest during 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, and 1995 to deduct            
          the losses that they claimed from PKVI LP on their joint Federal            
          income tax returns for those years (Issue #5);                              
               (6) whether the Roses had sufficient basis in their Zephyr             
          interest during 1990, 1991, and 1992 to deduct the losses that              
          they claimed from that S corporation on their joint Federal                 
          income tax returns for those years (Issue #6);                              
               (7) whether the Roses had sufficient basis in their                    
          St. Louis Pipeline Corp. interest during 1994 and 1995 to deduct            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011