PK Ventures, Inc. and Subsidiaries, et al. - Page 14

                                       - 103 -                                        
          On each of these occasions, the cases were continued on the joint           
          motion (or request) of the parties.  On three subsequent                    
          occasions, the cases were set for trial, Standing Pretrial Orders           
          were served, and the cases were continued on motion of one of the           
          parties.                                                                    
               On January 15, 2003, the Court issued Orders that, inter               
          alia, required the parties to exchange all nonstipulation                   
          material, including any schedules, charts, and other documents              
          that collected or summarized testimony or documents that were for           
          impeachment purposes, by March 14, 2003, and required the parties           
          to exchange a list of all documents already in the possession of            
          opposing counsel.                                                           
               On August 26, 2003, these cases were set for trial to                  
          commence on February 2, 2004.  The parties were directed to                 
          comply with the Standing Pretrial Order that was served on                  
          April 22, 2003, a copy of which was attached.                               
               During trial of these cases on February 4-6, 2004,                     
          petitioners attempted to move into evidence a large number of               
          documents that had not been provided to respondent until sometime           
          on or after January 19, 2004.  A significant portion of these               
          documents had not been provided to respondent until the morning             
          of February 4, 2004.  Respondent objected to many of these                  
          documents’ being received in evidence on the grounds that the               
          documents were hearsay and had not been exchanged in accordance             






Page:  Previous  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011