PK Ventures, Inc. and Subsidiaries, et al. - Page 88

                                       - 33 -                                         
               No direct references were made and no explanations were                
          provided in PK Ventures, TBPC, or TPTC’s financial statements for           
          the year ended December 31, 1989, as to the amounts that                    
          PK Ventures, TBPC, and TPTC transferred to Zephyr during that               
          year.  Furthermore, no mention of Zephyr’s bankruptcy was made in           
          PK Ventures, TBPC, or TPTC’s financial statements for the year              
          ended December 31, 1989.                                                    
               PKV&S claimed a $953,652 bad debt deduction on its                     
          consolidated income tax return for 1989 for cash transfers that             
          PK Ventures, TBPC, and TPTC had made to Zephyr.  PKV&S did not              
          attach to this return an explanation for claiming this bad debt             
          deduction.  On the Schedule L attached to PKV&S’s consolidated              
          income tax return for 1989, PK Ventures and its subsidiaries                
          reported a total of $90,000 due from Zephyr under “Other assets”            
          as of the end of that year.  This amount was described as “DUE              
          FROM UNCONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES”.  There were no amounts                   
          separately identified as interest payments received and/or                  
          imputed by PK Ventures, TBPC, or TPTC from Zephyr on PKV&S’s                
          consolidated income tax return for 1989.                                    
                    4.  1990                                                          
               On its Form 1120S for 1990, Zephyr represented that “No                
          income or expense items where [sic] reported on the tax return              
          due to the fact that the corporation was not solvent after the              
          completion of the bankruptcy.”                                              






Page:  Previous  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011