Lloyd Pragasam - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
               The Decision Letter stated in part:  “Your due process                 
          hearing request was not filed within the time prescribed under              
          Section 6320 and/or 6330.  However, you received a hearing                  
          equivalent to a due process hearing except that there is no right           
          to dispute a decision by the Appeals Office in court under IRC              
          Sections 6320 and/or 6330.”                                                 
               Respondent filed a motion to dismiss for lack of                       
          jurisdiction.  Petitioner filed an objection to respondent’s                
          motion to dismiss.  Respondent filed a supplement to the motion             
          to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.  Petitioner filed a                    
          supplemental objection to the motion to dismiss.                            
               The Court held a hearing on respondent’s motion to dismiss             
          for lack of jurisdiction.                                                   
                                       OPINION                                        
               The parties dispute whether petitioner is entitled to a                
          collection hearing.  Respondent argues that this Court should               
          dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction as petitioner did not             
          file a timely hearing request in response to each first Notice of           
          Federal Tax Lien filed for tax years 1995, 1996, and 1997.                  
          Petitioner argues that he did not receive the March 1, 2000, or             
          the March 19, 2001, notice, that the first notice regarding his             
          1995, 1996, and 1997 liabilities that he received was in November           
          2003, and he requested a hearing in response to that notice.                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011