Hector Prowse - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         
          appear for trial, respondent moved for a default judgment, and we           
          granted the motion with respect to the original deficiency as               
          corrected.  However, even if we had denied respondent’s motion,             
          we would still have concluded that respondent’s determination               
          disallowing petitioner’s Schedule C expenses must be sustained.             
          Our reasons are summarized below.                                           
               B.  Bad Debt Deduction                                                 
               Section 166(a)(1) authorizes a taxpayer to deduct a business           
          bad debt that becomes worthless during the year.  To be entitled            
          to the deduction, the taxpayer must prove (1) that a bona fide              
          debt was created obligating the debtor to pay a fixed or                    
          determinable sum of money, (2) that the debt was created or                 
          acquired in proximate relation to a trade or business, and (3)              
          that the debt became worthless in the year claimed.  See United             
          States v. Generes, 405 U.S. 93, 96 (1972); Calumet Indus., Inc.             
          v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 257, 284 (1990).  A debt is bona fide if           
          it arose “from a debtor-creditor relationship based upon a valid            
          and enforceable obligation to pay a fixed or determinable sum of            
          money.”  Sec. 1.166-1(c), Income Tax Regs.                                  
               In this case, petitioner claimed a bad debt deduction for              
          compensation that he claimed he was entitled to but did not                 
          receive in connection with his participation in a joint venture             
          with Thacker Engineering, Inc. (Thacker), beginning in                      
          approximately 1995.  Petitioner, a cash basis taxpayer, did not             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011