Robert C. and Gail K. Racine - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          margin account is properly treated as the grant of another option           
          to buy the shares and that petitioners were thus not taxable when           
          Mrs. Racine exercised her options.  Instead, petitioners contend            
          that none of their own capital was at risk at the time the option           
          was exercised.  Thus, according to petitioners, they should be              
          subject to tax only when the shares were sold to pay the margin             
          debt.                                                                       
               Respondent argues that the exception treating the exercise             
          of an option as the creation of another option does not apply and           
          that the income was properly reported when Mrs. Racine exercised            
          her options rather than when the shares were liquidated to pay              
          off margin debt.  We agree with respondent.                                 
               The facts of the case are very similar to a case decided by            
          this Court.  See Facq v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2006-111.7  In            
          Facq, the taxpayer exercised stock options granted by his                   
          employer using the stock as collateral in obtaining a loan from a           
          third party.  Id.  The stock declined and eventually the taxpayer           
          was forced to liquidate the stock in order to meet the margin               

               7See also Palahnuk v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 87 (2006)             
          (held that income from stock options exercised through margin               
          loan was properly reported in tax year in which the options were            
          exercised); United States v. Tuff, 359 F. Supp. 2d 1129 (W.D.               
          Wash. 2005) (shares of stock were transferred to taxpayer, as               
          required for shares to be taxable, at time taxpayer used margin             
          loan from broker to exercise stock options); Facq v. United                 
          States, 363 F. Supp. 2d 1288 (W.D. Wash. 2005) (taxpayer’s                  
          exercise of stock options was a taxable event); Miller v. United            
          States, 345 F. Supp. 2d 1046 (N.D. Cal. 2004) (taxpayer’s                   
          exercise of stock options was a taxable event).                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011