- 7 - of correctness as to either notice. Smith v. Commissioner, supra; INI, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-112, affd. without published opinion 107 F.3d 27 (11th Cir. 1997). 1. Whether Petitioners Must Include the $12,000 in Gross Income In general, a distribution from a qualified retirement plan5 is taxable to the distributee under section 72 (relating to annuities). Sec. 402(a); Darby v. Commissioner, 97 T.C. 51, 57 (1991). Neither the Code nor the regulations define the term “distributee”. This Court has concluded, however, that the term ordinarily means the participant or beneficiary who, under the plan, is entitled to receive the distribution. Darby v. Commissioner, supra at 58; Seidel v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-67. Section 402(e)(1)(A) provides an exception to the general rule of section 402(a). It provides that the “spouse or former spouse” of the plan participant who receives “any distribution or payment made * * * under a qualified domestic relations order (as defined in section 414(p))” shall be considered an “alternate payee” and taxed on such distribution or payments as the distributee. Sec. 402(e)(1)(A); Darby v. Commissioner, supra at 5 Although the parties did not address the qualified status of the Delta plan, there is nothing in the record that would lead us to believe that the employees’ trust is not described in sec. 401(a) and not exempt from tax under sec. 501(a).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011