Homer L. Richardson - Page 24

                                       - 24 -                                         
          group of State Farm agents, including Mr. Young, to “get out” of            
          the Aegis system and to resolve their tax audit matters.                    
               While the criminal investigation was ongoing, the IRS also             
          commenced an investigation of Mr. Richardson under section 6700,            
          which imposes a civil penalty for the promotion of abusive tax              
          shelters.  Petitioners were formally notified of the                        
          investigation, likewise conducted by Mr. Morgason, in or about              
          September of 2002.  Mr. Richardson attended an initial conference           
          in connection with the section 6700 investigation on November 8,            
          2002, and both spouses attended a closing conference on December            
          17, 2002.  Mr. Richardson raised various frivolous arguments at             
          those conferences, including challenges to the authority of the             
          IRS, and while he provided documents, he declined to provide any            
          of the documentation requested by Mr. Morgason.                             
               Following the December meeting, the IRS referred the section           
          6700 case to the Department of Justice.  On February 5, 2003, the           
          United States filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for              
          the Southern District of Ohio against Mr. Graham, individually              
          and doing business as Graham & Associates, and against Mr.                  
          Richardson, individually and doing business as HGAMC.  United               
          States v. Graham, No. 1:03cv96 (S.D. Ohio filed Feb. 5, 2003).9             
          The Government sought injunctive relief against the defendants              
          with respect to promotion of alleged abusive trust schemes.  Id.            


               9 See infra discussion regarding judicial notice.                      




Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011