Sid Paul Ruckriegel - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
               Ralph Michel (Michel) was the outside C.P.A., and he                   
          prepared tax returns for Paulan and Sidal for 1997, 1998, and               
          2000 and for petitioners for 1997-2000.  He has been the                    
          principal tax adviser to petitioners since 1976 and to Paulan and           
          Sidal since their formation in 1993.  Ernst & Young (EY) prepared           
          and compiled financial statements for Paulan and Sidal and                  
          prepared tax returns for those entities for 1999.  EY did not               
          audit the books of either entity.                                           
          Prior Audits and Tax Planning Discussions Between Michel and                
          Petitioners                                                                 
               Respondent audited petitioners’ 1995 and 1996 returns.  A              
          result of that audit was the denial of petitioners’ deductions of           
          Sidal’s 1995 and 1996 losses on the ground that petitioners                 
          lacked bases in Sidal.  Petitioners paid the deficiencies                   
          relating to the denial of those deductions.  After that audit,              
          Michel spoke with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) agent who              
          conducted the audit regarding the proper way to structure future            
          loans to Sidal so as to enable petitioners to achieve bases in              
          Sidal equal to the loan amounts.  In 1997, after that                       
          conversation, Michel advised petitioners that loans to Sidal                
          could be structured to obtain tax bases for them in Sidal, and he           
          advised them regarding that structure.  The 1997-2000 loans to              
          Sidal were structured in accordance with Michel’s advice.  The              
          IRS agent auditing petitioners’ 1997 and 1998 tax years did not             
          challenge petitioners’ passthrough deductions of Sidal’s losses             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011