Kenneth A. Sapp - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
               Respondent treated the Forms 1040X for 1990 and 1991 as                
          claims for refund which he formally disallowed as untimely by               
          letter on April 25, 1997.  Respondent treated the Form 1040X for            
          1993 as a frivolous return and assessed a frivolous return                  
          penalty under section 6702 on October 27, 1997.                             
               Respondent issued a notice of deficiency to petitioner for             
          1996 on June 5, 1998, determining a deficiency in income tax of             
          $7,405, as well as additions to tax under sections 6651(a)(1) and           
          6654.  No petition was filed in response to the notice of                   
          deficiency, and respondent assessed the amounts determined in the           
          notice, as well as interest (collectively, the 1996 liability),             
          on November 9, 1998.  The 1996 liability was unpaid at the time             
          of trial.                                                                   
               On March 7, 2001, a Letter 1058, Final Notice - Notice of              
          Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing, was mailed            
          to petitioner concerning the 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, and 1996               
          liabilities.  Petitioner timely filed a Form 12153, Request for a           
          Collection Due Process Hearing, for all of the aforementioned               
          liabilities.  Petitioner's Form 12153 also requested a hearing              
          with respect to notices of Federal tax lien filing regarding the            
          foregoing liabilities.                                                      
               By letter dated July 9, 2001, the Office of Appeals                    
          (Appeals) notified petitioner that his request had been assigned            
          to Appeals officer Lawrence Ford (AO Ford) and requested that               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011