Claude E. and Dana L. Salazar - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          because respondent did not issue a notice of determination                  
          regarding the unpaid employment tax liabilities and because there           
          is no dispute over employment status.  Respondent also argues               
          that he did not make a determination concerning employment                  
          status.  We agree with respondent.                                          
               It is undisputed that petitioners did not receive a formal             
          notice of determination from respondent with respect to Mr.                 
          Salazar’s employment tax liabilities.  Petitioners argue,                   
          however, that respondent’s January 4, 2005, rejection letter                
          addressing petitioners’ offer-in-compromise for the employment              
          tax periods, which was sent in the same envelope as the notice of           
          determination for the income tax liabilities, is sufficient to              
          constitute a determination with respect to the employment tax               
          liabilities for purposes of section 6330.  Alternatively,                   
          petitioners contend that respondent should be compelled to issue            
          a notice of determination with respect to Mr. Salazar’s                     
          employment tax liabilities because petitioners included those               
          liabilities in their request for a section 6330 hearing.                    
               Under section 6330(c)(2)(A), a taxpayer may raise at a                 
          section 6330 hearing any relevant issue relating to the unpaid              
          tax or the proposed levy, including appropriate spousal defenses,           
          challenges to the appropriateness of collection action, and                 
          offers of collection alternatives.  Under some circumstances, a             
          taxpayer may also challenge the existence or amount of the                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011