Millard J. and Jacquie M. Scott - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
          and introduced during the Court proceeding credible evidence with           
          respect to the factual issue.  Although neither party alleges the           
          applicability of section 7491(a), we conclude that the burden of            
          proof has not shifted with respect to the issue in the present              
          case.                                                                       
               Section 61(a) defines gross income as “all income from                 
          whatever source derived,” unless otherwise provided.  The Supreme           
          Court has consistently given this definition of gross income a              
          liberal construction “in recognition of the intention of Congress           
          to tax all gains except those specifically exempted.”                       
          Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426, 430 (1955); see           
          also Roemer v. Commissioner, 716 F.2d 693, 696 (9th Cir. 1983)              
          (all realized accessions to wealth are presumed taxable income,             
          unless the taxpayer can demonstrate that an acquisition is                  
          specifically exempted from taxation), revg. 79 T.C. 398 (1982).             
               It is beyond dispute that “Income from discharge of                    
          indebtedness” is included within the broad definition of income.            
          Sec. 61(a)(12); sec. 1.61-12(a), Income Tax Regs.  “The                     
          underlying rationale for such inclusion is that to the extent a             
          taxpayer is released from indebtedness, he or she realizes an               
          accession to income due to the freeing of assets previously                 
          offset by the liability.”  Jelle v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 63, 67           
          (2001) (citing United States v. Kirby Lumber Co., 284 U.S. 1, 3             
          (1931)).                                                                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011