Patrick M. Shannon - Page 14

                                       - 13 -                                         
               a carry back from later years to further correct the                   
               liability to a lower amount.  Refunds were taken from                  
               later years to make additional payments.                               
               Since the return was filed later and insufficient                      
               withholding was set up, the account includes the fail-                 
               ure to pay penalty, the failure to file penalty, an                    
               estimated tax penalty and interest.  As amendments and                 
               payments were applied, corrections were made to the                    
               account.                                                               
               In review of a current transcript, Appeals finds the                   
               Service levied and took $2,236.512 on 05-17-2004, after                
               the taxpayer had timely requested an appeal.  This                     
               amount shouldn’t have been levied.  The late posting of                
               the request for appeals allowed the Service to enforce                 
               a levy action without a suspension during the CDP                      
               suspension period.  The CDP unit in Covington, KY was                  
               advised to return the levied funds and it was refunded                 
               during the hearing period.                                             
                               DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS                                
                    APPLICABLE LAW AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES                      
                  *       *       *       *       *       *       *                   
               In review of the file and transcripts, it appears that                 
               all manual and legal procedures have been properly                     
               followed.  This Appeals Officer has not dealt with this                
               taxpayer in the past regarding this liability.  I did                  
               have involvement in the taxpayer’s corporation in the                  
               past, but not regarding the current type of individual                 
               taxes or years.  The taxpayer signed a waiver of my                    
               involvement.                                                           
               I found one error on May 17, 2004, when the Service                    
               took levy funds during the CDP hearing period of col-                  
               lection suspension.  The CDP unit was advised to return                
               the funds.  The cause for the premature levy action was                
               the late input of the suspension code on the account.                  
               The request for a hearing was timely received on March                 
               12, 2004 but the suspension code TC 520 cc 77 was not                  
               input until cycle 200429, approximately August.  Ap-                   
               peals believes the CDP unit didn’t recognize the CDP                   
               request until June of 2004 because the taxpayer didn’t                 
               use form 12253.  When they allowed the CDP hearing, the                
               CDP unit should ensure premature levy was returned to                  
               the taxpayer.                                                          





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011