Richard D. Smart - Page 6

                                        - 5 -                                         
          and the remainder would be subject to the additional 10-percent             
          tax.                                                                        
               A “[q]ualified first-time homebuyer distribution” is any               
          payment received by an individual to the extent that the                    
          distribution is used by that individual within 120 days to pay              
          qualified acquisition costs with respect to a principal residence           
          if the individual is a first-time homebuyer.  Sec. 72(t)(8)(A).             
          Unfortunately, the exception under 72(t)(8) is a technical one,             
          and, because of tragic family circumstances, petitioner falls               
          outside the exception.                                                      
               Petitioner received the distribution in late 2002.  His                
          younger brother passed away in 2003, and consequently,                      
          petitioner’s new home acquisition was delayed until the fall of             
          2004, bringing him outside the 120-day window.                              
               If the language of a statute is plain, clear, and                      
          unambiguous, the statutory language is to be applied according to           
          its terms unless a literal interpretation of the statutory                  
          language would lead to absurd results.  Robinson v. Shell Oil               
          Co., 519 U.S. 337, 340 (1997); Consumer Prod. Safety Commn. v.              
          GTE Sylvania, Inc., 447 U.S. 102, 108 (1980); United States v.              
          Am. Trucking Associations, Inc., 310 U.S. 534, 543-544 (1940);              
          Allen v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 1, 7 (2002).  In the instant                
          case, the Court deeply sympathizes with petitioner for his loss,            
          but we are bound by the statutory language and unable to extend             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011