Roy Jay Stallard - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
                    Accordingly, an Appeals representative in his or                  
                    her conclusions of fact or application of the law                 
                    * * * shall hew to the law and the recognized                     
                    standards of legal construction.  It shall be his                 
                    or her duty to determine the correct amount of the                
                    tax, with strict impartiality as between the tax-                 
                    payer and the Government, and without favoritism                  
                    or discrimination as between taxpayers.”  (empha-                 
                    sis added).                                                       
                    3.  Unlike the penalties proposed at lines 7a and                 
               7b of the Form 4549A attached to the notice of defi-                   
               ciency, infra, the Form 4549A report does not give any                 
               notice of the law, statutory or otherwise, which was                   
               applied in concluding that I was, indeed, the person                   
               made liable for the payment of the purported debt.                     
               This omission raises the question of whether or not                    
               liability to pay might arises out of some non-statutory                
               law.  Whatever the case may be, the notice of defi-                    
               ciency does not give fair notice of it.                                
                    4.  Because, with respect to a tax imposed on the                 
               transfer of property, the person made liable for its                   
               payment may be the transferor, transferee or as in the                 
               case of the death tax, a third party, due process                      
               requires that Congress identify the person made liable                 
               for payment of each tax imposed, and so it usually                     
               does.  The legal personality of each person made liable                
               for the payment every other tax imposed by Congress is                 
               described clearly within the IRC, but such is not the                  
               case with regard to the purported tax debt here.  There                
               is neither an Act of Congress nor a Treasury Regulation                
               which clearly and unequivocally identifies the person                  
               made liable for the payment of the purported tax debt.                 
               [Reproduced literally.]                                                
               On November 2, 2005, respondent filed respondent’s motion.             
          On November 17, 2005, the Court issued an Order (Court’s November           
          17, 2005 Order) in which it ordered petitioner to file a written            
          response to respondent’s motion by December 9, 2005.  In that               
          Order, the Court also indicated that the petition contains                  
          statements, contentions, and arguments that the Court finds to be           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011