Kathlyn S. Starbuck - Page 2

                                         -2-                                          
          where no deficiency has been asserted, and we shall therefore               
          dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction on our own motion.               
                                     Background                                       
               Some of the facts have been stipulated.  The stipulation of            
          facts and the accompanying exhibits are incorporated by this                
          reference.  Petitioner resided in San Diego County, California,             
          at the time she filed the petition.                                         
               Petitioner and her former spouse married in February 1988,             
          separated in January 2000, and divorced in April 2002. Respondent           
          did not determine a deficiency in this case.  The taxes at issue            
          are the taxes for 1998 and 1999 that petitioner and her former              
          spouse reported were due on their joint returns but did not pay.            
               Petitioner filed a request for relief from her tax                     
          liabilities for the years at issue on Form 8857, Request for                
          Innocent Spouse Relief, with respondent in July 2003.  Respondent           
          determined that petitioner was not entitled to relief for the               
          years at issue.  Petitioner timely filed a petition with this               
          Court.                                                                      
                                     Discussion                                       
               After the trial, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth               
          Circuit, the court to which this case is appealable, held that we           
          do not have jurisdiction to consider the Commissioner’s denials             
          of requests for relief under section 6015(f) where no deficiency            
          has been asserted.  Commissioner v. Ewing, 439 F.3d 1009 (9th               
          Cir. 2006), revg. 118 T.C. 494 (2002), vacating 122 T.C. 32                 
          (2004).  We have since come to the same conclusion.  Billings v.            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011