State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Subsidiaries - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
          the tax overpayment itself and the interest to be paid on                   
          interest is not found in the statute.”                                      
               Petitioner further challenges the Court of Appeals for the             
          Federal Circuit’s position that section 6611 authorizes the                 
          payment of interest by explaining that only simple interest was             
          paid before section 6622 became law.  Interest on interest is a             
          function of the compounding provided by section 6622; however,              
          the interest that is compounded originates as the interest                  
          authorized by section 6611 on an overpayment, and the rate of               
          both is set by section 6621.  One common component of the                   
          interest rate applicable to all overpayments is the Federal                 
          short-term rate.  Sec. 6621(a)(1)(A).  The Federal short-term               
          rate used in section 6621(a)(1)(A) is redetermined on a quarterly           
          basis.  Sec. 6621(b).  A fluctuation in the Federal short-term              
          rate affects the rate applicable to corporate overpayments under            
          both sections 6611 and 6622.  Similarly, there is no logical                
          reason that requires a different result regarding the GATT rate             
          change, effective after December 31, 1994.                                  
               Petitioner points to the refund estimates prepared for                 
          Congress at the time the GATT rate was adopted to support its               
          position.  Petitioner asserts that in these estimates accrued               
          interest was not subject to the lower GATT rate.  Petitioner also           
          argues that respondent initially applied the GATT rate only to              
          the overpayment, not the accrued interest, and now respondent has           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011