- 3 -
Beginning September 9, 2004, petitioners, petitioners’
attorney, and respondent held a series of phone calls and written
correspondence relating to petitioners’ Appeals Office hearing.
Some financial information was submitted by petitioners, and
respondent’s Appeals officer reviewed that material and asked
petitioners for additional information.
Petitioners submitted some additional financial information
to respondent’s Appeals Office, but certain financial information
that had been requested by respondent’s Appeals officer was not
provided by petitioners. For example, petitioners never
submitted documents requested by respondent’s Appeals officer
that would have established the fact of payment of petitioners’
medical and drug expenses.
Based on the financial information petitioners submitted,
respondent’s Appeals officer determined that petitioners had
significantly more discretionary monthly income, equity in
assets, and realizable collection potential (RCP) than
petitioners would acknowledge. The figures petitioners and
respondent’s Appeals officer respectively calculated are set
forth below:
Petitioners Respondent
Discretionary Monthly Income $ 0 $ 2,937
Equity in Assets 82,853 319,535
RCP 127,087 460,511
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011