Diana Stroud, Petitioner, and Thomas M. Stroud, Intervenor - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
               On October 31, 1999, Mr. and Mrs. Stroud separated and                 
          commenced dissolution proceedings.  On July 21, 2000, petitioner,           
          pursuant to section 6015(f), filed a Form 8857, Request for                 
          Innocent Spouse Relief, for joint income tax liabilities relating           
          to 1994 and 1996 through 1998.  In October of 2000, Mr. and Mrs.            
          Stroud sold the residence and paid their 1994 and 1996 tax                  
          liabilities.                                                                
               On March 25, 2002, respondent granted petitioner’s request             
          for innocent spouse relief relating to 1994 and 1996 but denied             
          her relief relating to 1997 and 1998.  Respondent, however, did             
          not grant petitioner’s request for refunds of $10,777 and $34,367           
          that constituted one-half of the payment applied to the 1994 and            
          1996 income tax liabilities, respectively.  On April 4, 2002,               
          petitioner appealed respondent’s decision denying her a refund              
          relating to 1994 and 1996.  On October 13, 2004, respondent’s               
          Appeals officer denied petitioner’s appeal regarding her refund             
          request but upheld respondent’s determinations to grant                     
          petitioner equitable relief relating to 1994 and 1996.                      
               On January 18, 2005, while residing in Fountain Valley,                
          California, petitioner filed her petition seeking a                         
          redetermination of respondent’s denial of a refund relating to              
          1994 and 1996.                                                              
                                       OPINION                                        
               We may exercise jurisdiction only to the extent authorized             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011