Jorge O. and Clelia E. Svoboda - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
                                       OPINION                                        
          Income on Exercise of Stock Options                                         
               Respondent determined that petitioners' 2002 return                    
          understated his compensation income by $73,374, an amount                   
          representing the aggregate difference between the option prices             
          and sales prices of the Fluor stock petitioner acquired and sold            
          in 2002 pursuant to stock options.  Petitioners contend that the            
          foregoing amount is capital gain because it was realized from the           
          sale of stock acquired pursuant to incentive stock options.                 
               Generally, the income tax treatment of the grant of an                 
          option to purchase stock in connection with the performance of              
          services, and the transfer of stock pursuant to the exercise of             
          such an option, is determined under section 83(a) and the                   
          regulations thereunder.  Such stock options are known as                    
          "nonqualified stock options" or "nonstatutory stock options".               
          The receipt of a nonqualified stock option does not generate                
          income in the recipient unless the option has a readily                     
          ascertainable fair market value.6  Instead, the recipient's                 
          exercise of the nonqualified option to acquire stock gives rise             
          to gross income at the time of exercise, equal to the amount by             
          which the fair market value of the stock at the exercise date               

               6 Neither party contends that the stock options held by                
          petitioner had a "readily ascertainable fair market value" at the           
          time that Fluor granted the options to petitioner.  See sec. 83;            
          sec. 1.83-1(a), Income Tax Regs.; sec. 1.83-7(a), Income Tax                
          Regs.                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011