Thomas J. Sweeney - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
          his Federal income tax return for 2002, petitioner did not                  
          include any income from the corporation.                                    
               Petitioner and his spouse each filed Federal income tax                
          returns for 2002 as married filing separately.  Respondent’s                
          records reflect that petitioner’s spouse reported on her return             
          $9,314, or one-half of the taxable income of the S corporation.             
          In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined a deficiency             
          against petitioner for the unreported $9,314 in flow-through                
          income from Lake Vista Billing Services, Inc.                               
               Petitioner contends he never received any of the proceeds of           
          the corporation’s profitable activity for the year at issue.  He            
          and his wife had serious problems between them during the year,             
          which he described at trial as follows:                                     

               This is my whole argument, Your Honor.  During the second              
               week of January 2002, my wife proceeded to throw me out of             
               my home, which is where the business was located.  She                 
               changed the locks.  She stripped our corporate bank                    
               accounts, our personal bank accounts, charged up all the               
               cash she could on my credit cards to over $50,000, $60,000,            
               and she physically, lock, stock, and barrel, locked me out             
               of the corporation.                                                    

               Although petitioner engaged the services of an attorney in             
          connection with his marital problems, no evidence was offered to            
          show what was resolved between petitioner and his wife regarding            
          the corporation.  The notice of deficiency was ultimately issued            
          to petitioner in which a deficiency was determined based on the             
          inclusion in income of petitioner’s share of the S corporation’s            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011