Gerald R. Tassielli - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
          from the adjustments and notified petitioner of the changes to              
          his tax return on February 5, 2001.                                         
               Several months later, respondent determined a $9,823                   
          deficiency for petitioner’s taxable year 1999.  The deficiency              
          was attributable solely to alternative minimum tax (AMT).2                  
          Respondent issued petitioner a notice of deficiency on December             
          18, 2001, which states in part: “If you want to contest this                
          determination in court before making payment, you have until * *            
          * 90 days from the date of this letter * * * to file a petition             
          with the United States Tax Court.”  The notice of deficiency                
          explains how to obtain a petition and provides the Tax Court’s              
          mailing address.                                                            
               On March 18, 2002, petitioner sent a letter to the Internal            
          Revenue Service in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, along with a copy            
          of the notice of deficiency.  The letter states: “I do not agree            
          with the action taken against me reflected in the accompanying              
          letter.  Hence, I would like to petition the U.S. Tax Court.  I             
          want to contest this claim.”  Petitioner did not send a copy of             
          the letter to the Tax Court.  Respondent sent petitioner a letter           
          dated March 26, 2002, informing petitioner that if he wished to             
          challenge respondent’s determination, he must follow the                    
          instructions contained in the notice of deficiency.  Petitioner             


               2 Petitioner’s 1999 tax return did not include a computation           
          of his AMT liability.                                                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011