Sue Taylor - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          time period payable to Nature’s Herb & Tea Garden which had been            
          deposited into the Norwest Bank Arizona, N.A. account titled,               
          “Sue Taylor d|b|a Natures’s Herb & Tea Garden”.  Respondent also            
          provided copies of checks drawn on Nature’s Herb & Tea Garden’s             
          Norwest Bank Arizona, N.A. account and signed by petitioner, as             
          well as copies of the account’s bank statements reflecting Sue              
          Taylor DBA Nature’s Herb & Tea Garden.                                      
                                       OPINION                                        
          I.   Contentions of the Parties                                             
               On the premise of tax protester arguments, petitioner                  
          contends that she did not receive any taxable income for 1999 and           
          2000.  She also maintains, among other things, that any income              
          received by any LLCs in which she was a member cannot be                    
          attributed to her because respondent did not issue the LLCs a               
          final partnership administrative adjustment (FPAA) before issuing           
          the notice of deficiency.  Further, petitioner states that even             
          if income in 1999 and 2000 can be attributed to her, she is                 
          entitled to deductions, allowances, and credits that should have            
          reduced her tax liability to zero.  Petitioner also asserts that            
          she should be entitled to recover her litigation and/or                     
          administrative costs.9  Lastly, petitioner raises tax protester             

               9 Although petitioner claimed in her petition that she                 
          should be entitled to recovery of her administrative or                     
          litigation costs, she did not argue for costs at trial or on                
          brief.  In any event, consideration of her eligibility for costs            
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011