- 9 - petitioner with another opportunity to provide requested books and records. The document titled “The Truth about Frivolous Tax Arguments” provided petitioner with specific legal citations showing why such frivolous tax arguments have been rejected. Petitioner failed to comply with reasonable requests of the IRS to provide books and records. Petitioner continued taking a frivolous position throughout his IRS appeals proceedings. Discussion Before we address the substantive issues in the instant case, we must decide whether the record should be reopened to receive new evidence. After briefs were due in the instant case, petitioner filed a motion requesting a reopening of the record for the introduction of new evidence to support his indebtedness and subsequent contribution of the note proceeds to the capital of the company. Reopening the record for the submission of additional evidence lies within the discretion of the Court. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 401 U.S. 321, 331 (1971). A court will not grant a motion to reopen the record unless, among other requirements, the evidence is material to the issues involved and probably would change the outcome of the case. See Coleman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-248, affd. withoutPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011