Jorge Torres - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
               On August 19, 2004, respondent sent to petitioner a Final              
          Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing              
          because petitioner failed to pay his outstanding 2001 tax                   
          liability.  The notice informed petitioner that respondent                  
          intended to levy to collect the unpaid liability for the 2001               
          taxable year.  The notice also stated that petitioner could                 
          “Appeal the intended levy on your property by requesting a                  
          Collection Due Process hearing within 30 days from the date of              
          this letter.”                                                               
               On September 7, 2004, petitioner timely filed a Form 12153,            
          Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing.  Before                       
          respondent’s Appeals officer and petitioner held a section 6330             
          hearing, the Court scheduled petitioner’s case in docket No.                
          5812-04S for trial on February 14, 2005.  On December 2, 2004,              
          respondent’s settlement officer conducted a section 6330 hearing            
          with petitioner and discussed collection alternatives.  Although            
          respondent’s settlement officer researched petitioner’s tax                 
          records and tentatively concluded that petitioner had not acted             
          on the notice, he elected to postpone his determination until the           
          Court reached a decision.                                                   
               Respondent subsequently filed a motion to dismiss for lack             
          of jurisdiction in docket No. 5812-04S.  On March 1, 2005, the              
          Court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss because petitioner             
          failed to file the petition in that case within the time                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011