- 6 - the Ninth Circuit, to which this case is appealable, has identified a three-step approach for determining the application of collateral estoppel: (1) An identification of the issues in the two actions for the purposes of determining whether the issues are sufficiently similar and sufficiently material in both actions to justify invoking the doctrine; (2) an examination of the record of the prior case to decide whether the issue was “litigated” in the first case; and (3) an examination of the record of the prior proceeding to ascertain whether the issue was necessarily decided in the first case. [United States v. McLaurin, 57 F.3d 823, 826 (9th Cir. 1995); emphasis omitted.] It is well established that a subsequent guilty plea may be used to establish issue preclusion in a subsequent civil suit where an element of the crime to which the defendant pled guilty is at issue in the second suit. See, e.g., United States v. $31,697.59 Cash, 665 F.2d 903 (9th Cir. 1982). Because the elements of criminal tax evasion and civil tax fraud are identical, petitioner’s prior conviction under section 7201 conclusively establishes the elements necessary for finding fraud under section 6663. See Marretta v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-128, affd. 168 Fed. Appx. 528 (3d Cir. 2006); Frey v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-226; see also Brooks v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 413, 431 (1984) (holding that a section 7201 conviction collaterally estops a taxpayer from denying fraud for purposes of section 6653(b), the predecessor of section 6663), affd. without published opinion 772 F.2d 910 (9th Cir.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011