Michael Davon Westbrook - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
          entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion              
          should not be cited as authority.                                           
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $1,760 in petitioner’s           
          2000 Federal income tax and a $352 accuracy-related penalty under           
          section 6662(a).                                                            
               The issues for decision are:  (1) Whether petitioner is                
          entitled to various deductions claimed on Schedule A, Itemized              
          Deductions; and (2) whether the underpayment of tax required to             
          be shown on petitioner’s 2000 Federal income tax return is due to           
          negligence or intentional disregard of rules or regulations.                
          Background                                                                  
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.  At           
          the time the petition was filed, petitioner resided in New York,            
          New York.                                                                   
               Petitioner holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of            
          Idaho.  In 1993 he began employment with Cooper Union School of             
          Engineering (Cooper Union) as a technician in the chemistry                 
          department.  While employed by Cooper Union, petitioner enrolled            
          in its graduate program and in 1998, he was awarded a master’s              
          degree in engineering.                                                      
               While working and attending classes at Cooper Union,                   
          petitioner incorporated Suffola, Inc. (Suffola), a corporation              
          organized under the laws of Idaho.  At all relevant times,                  
          petitioner was the sole owner of all of Suffola’s outstanding               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011