- 14 - in order to prevail on his constitutional argument, petitioner must nonetheless show that the IRS’s failure to prepare, or to help him in preparing, Form 1040 with Schedule C for his taxable year 2000 was not premised upon a rational basis,12 see Regan v. Taxation With Representation, 461 U.S. 540, 547 (1983), and instead was premised upon an impermissible basis such as race, religion, or the desire to prevent the exercise of petitioner’s constitutional rights, see United States v. Kahl, 583 F.2d 1351, 1353 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. Swanson, 509 F.2d 1205, 1208 (8th Cir. 1975). On the record before us, we find that petitioner has not carried his burden of establishing that the failure of the IRS to prepare, or to assist him in preparing, Form 1040 with Schedule C for his taxable year 2000 was based upon a constitutionally impermissible standard. We conclude that the IRS did not violate petitioner’s rights to equal protection (or to due process) under the Constitution. Based upon our examination of the entire record in this case, we find that petitioner has not carried his burden of establishing that the Court should reject the determination in the notice of determination to proceed with the collection action with respect to petitioner’s taxable year 1998. 12The IRS clearly lacks the resources to prepare tax returns for all taxpayers or to help all taxpayers in preparing such returns.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011