Charles Raymond Wheeler - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          Income Tax Examination Changes, was not signed; (4) the                     
          Individual Master File (IMF) for each year per the Forms 4340,              
          Certificate of Assessment, Payments, and Other Specified Matters,           
          shows no tax was ever assessed, no amounts due, and lacks a “code           
          494”;5 (5) Title 27, U.S.C., not Title 26, contains the                     
          implementing regulation for section 6020;6 and (6) he is not an             
          individual required to pay an income tax.                                   
               Respondent replies that the statutory notices of deficiency            
          were valid when issued.  Petitioner is liable for the income tax            
          and sections 6651(a)(1) and 6654 additions to tax because                   
          petitioner stipulated the income underlying the notices of                  

               4(...continued)                                                        
          18, affd. 54 Fed. Appx. 254 (9th Cir. 2002).                                
               5 An IMF is a computer-generated transcript of a taxpayer’s            
          account with the Internal Revenue Service showing by numeric                
          codes the dates certain transactions occurred, including the                
          identification of the taxpayer, the type of tax, the tax period,            
          the dates of assessment, and the amounts of assessment.  Klawonn            
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-27; Wiley v. United States, 71             
          AFTR 2d 93-1333 (S.D. Ohio 1992), affd. in part and revd. in part           
          on another issue 20 F.3d 222 (6th Cir. 1994).  A code 494                   
          normally records that a notice of deficiency has been sent.                 
          Wiley v. United States, 20 F.3d 222, 224 (6th Cir. 1994).                   
               6 Petitioner’s contention is unfounded as the implementing             
          regulation for sec. 6020 is sec. 301.6020-1, Proced. & Admin.               
          Regs.  In any event, this Court has held such an argument to be             
          frivolous.  See Richards Asset Mgmt. Trust v. Commissioner, T.C.            
          Memo. 2002-213; Stafford v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-50 n.12           
          (“the absence of implementing regulations would not, generally              
          speaking, preclude the Commissioner from enforcing sections of              
          the Internal Revenue Code.  Provisions of the Internal Revenue              
          Code generally do not require implementing regulations as a                 
          prerequisite to enforcement.”), affd. without published opinion             
          146 F.3d 868 (5th Cir. 1998).                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011