Charles Raymond Wheeler - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
                                     Background                                       
               Petitioner resided in Colorado Springs, Colorado, when he              
          petitioned the Court in this case.                                          
               Petitioner did not file a Federal income tax return for                
          2003.  Respondent issued a notice of deficiency to petitioner               
          determining that petitioner failed to report taxable retirement             
          distributions of $41,657, dividend income of $241, and interest             
          income of $3; that petitioner was liable for an income tax                  
          deficiency of $9,507; and that petitioner was liable for                    
          additions to tax under sections 6651(a)(1) and (2) and 6654.                
               On August 24, 2005, petitioner timely petitioned for                   
          redetermination of the deficiency and the additions to tax.  In             
          his petition, petitioner disputed the full amount of the                    
          deficiency and the additions to tax3 and alleged that there was a           
          multitude of errors in respondent’s determinations.  However,               
          most of the allegations in the petition either were                         
          unintelligible or, if intelligible, were frivolous.4  Petitioner            


               3Petitioner alleged in his petition that respondent had                
          determined “deficiencies” in income tax for 2003 of $12,368, all            
          of which is in dispute.  The amount represents the total tax,               
          penalties, and interest (computed to Apr. 24, 2005) due from                
          petitioner as shown on Form 4549, Income Tax Examination Changes            
          (included as part of the notice of deficiency).                             
               4For example, petitioner argued that he was not required to            
          file an information request for 2003, that he was not required to           
          file a return because respondent’s form violated the provisions             
          of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and that he was not liable for              
          any increase in tax for 2003 “pursuant to 44 U.S.C. � 3512.”                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011