- 10 - petition until July 19, 2005. Petitioner failed to comply with the Court’s orders to file a proper amended petition. After her case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, petitioner waited until the time for appeal was about to expire to file her motion for leave. Petitioner has been afforded several opportunities and sufficient time to file her amended petition. Petitioner has repeatedly failed to comply with the Court’s orders, and she has provided no reasonable excuses for her lack of compliance. Therefore, in the exercise of our discretion and in the interests of justice, we will deny petitioner’s motion for leave.6 It follows that the Court’s order of dismissal for lack of jurisdiction in this case became final on January 25, 2006, 90 days after the order was entered. To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order will be issued. 6 See Rice v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2006-236, Walther v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2006-247, Sprenger v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2006-248, Hoffman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2006-249, and McMaster v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2006-251, in each of which the taxpayer’s filings and failure to comply with the Court’s orders were similar, resulting in the denial of the taxpayer’s motion for leave to file a motion to vacate the order of dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: May 25, 2011