Robert William Woods - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          I.   The Parties’ Contentions.                                              
               Petitioner contends, for the first time in his brief, that             
          his tax liabilities for the years in issue have been discharged             
          under section 507 of the Bankruptcy Code.  Petitioner contends as           
          follows:                                                                    
               The issues addressed in 11 U.S.C. � 507(a)(8)(A)(ii)                   
               clearly state that if the tax was “assessed within 240                 
               days, plus any time plus 30 days [sic] during which an                 
               offer in compromise with respect to such tax that was                  
               made within the 240 days after such assessment was                     
               pending, before the date of the filing of the petition”                
               the taxes in question are not dischargeable.                           
               In the instant case, NONE of the things addressed in                   
               the above referenced code sections apply.  The taxes                   
               were, by the IRS’s own admission, assessed more than                   
               240 days prior to the bankruptcy petition being filed                  
               and there was no recent offer in compromise to take                    
               into consideration.                                                    
               Further, 11 U.S.C. �� 507 & 523 address the issue of                   
               when returns, if required, are filed.  Those sections                  
               clearly state that an income tax debt is dischargeable                 
               under [11] U.S.C. � 507(a)(8)(A)(i) if the tax                         
               return was last due, including extensions, more than 3                 
               years prior to the bankruptcy filing date.  * * *                      
               Obviously, since the latest year at issue is 1997 the 3                
               year time limit has run.                                               
          Petitioner also contends that respondent has no claim because               
          respondent failed to attend the creditors’ meeting on May 27,               
          2004, to claim the tax debt was not discharged.                             
               Respondent contends that, under Magana v. Commissioner, 118            
          T.C. 488 (2002), we need not consider petitioner’s bankruptcy               
          discharge in our review for an abuse of discretion under section            
          6330(d)(1) because petitioner failed to raise the issue during              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011