- 4 - end of 2003. Lila also occasionally lived with petitioners for weeks at a time. Petitioner did not introduce records of the time Nathan and Lila spent with him. On their 2003 joint Federal income tax return, petitioners claimed a deduction for dependency exemptions for Nathan and Lila.1 Petitioners did not attach to their return a Form 8332, Release of Claim to Exemption for Child of Divorced or Separated Parents, executed by Ms. Woodworth. Petitioner had asked Ms. Woodworth to sign a Form 8332, but she refused to do so. Respondent issued petitioners a notice of deficiency in June 2005, disallowing the claimed deduction for dependency exemptions. Discussion In general, the Commissioner’s determinations set forth in a notice of deficiency are presumed correct, and the taxpayer bears the burden of showing that the determinations are in error. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). Pursuant to section 7491(a), the burden of proof as to factual matters shifts to respondent under certain circumstances. Petitioners have neither alleged that section 7491(a) applies nor established their compliance with the requirements of section 7491(a)(2)(A) and (B) to substantiate items, maintain records, and cooperate 1 Petitioners did not claim a deduction with respect to Cyrus, and his status as a dependent is not in issue.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011