- 8 - determination based on an examination of petitioner’s bank statements as to whether he received the gambling income or not. The Court cannot make that determination because there is no evidence as to the sources of the other deposits4 or charges for recurring items. Finally, petitioner did not call any witnesses to corroborate the statements contained in the Forms SSA-795 or his testimony. Moreover, petitioner failed to call Mr. Umali himself as a witness to testify to the veracity of the statements that Mr. Umali made in the Forms SSA-795 or to corroborate petitioner’s testimony.5 Accordingly, respondent’s determination is sustained. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent. 4 For example, statement period Apr. 2--May 1, 2003, showed deposits of $1,240, $1,000, $650, $1,000, and $1,100. Statement period May 2--June 2, 2003, showed deposits of $650, $150, $290, and $30 (other than the $1,280 that petitioner claimed was from his wife’s paycheck). 5 Respondent represents that Mr. Umali has been out of the country since January 2006.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Last modified: November 10, 2007