Mila Alemasov and Victor Popov - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          degree in business and finance from the University of San                   
          Francisco.  Petitioner held a number of jobs before 1998, the               
          year she began working for Bank of America in the fields of                 
          finance and securities investment.  She worked for Bank of                  
          America until she was released sometime in 2001.                            
               In connection with her release, petitioner received                    
          “settlement fees” of $400,000 from Bank of America during 2002.4            
          In addition, petitioner received unemployment compensation of               
          $13,840 that year.  With the money received from these sources,             
          petitioner began an activity as a real estate finder and                    
          consultant, an activity that allowed her to attend to her two               
          minor children.5  Petitioner testified that she traveled to                 
          Hawaii, Korea, China, and Las Vegas during 2002 on behalf of her            
          clients to search for prospective real estate investment                    
          opportunities.  However, petitioner’s lack of a salesperson’s               


               4The nature and terms of these fees were not made part of              
          the record; however, petitioners included the $400,000 as income            
          on their income tax return for 2002.                                        
               5Petitioner decided to begin an activity as a real estate              
          finder and consultant sometime in September 2001.  Petitioner               
          claimed that as a real estate finder she searched for real estate           
          investments on behalf of clients interested in purchasing                   
          property.  She would, assuming that properties she recommended              
          were purchased, receive a fee for her services.  At trial,                  
          petitioner conceded that she did not enter into any written                 
          agreements in 2002 with her clients.  Although she testified that           
          she had numerous e-mail exchanges with clients during the year at           
          issue, she did not offer into evidence any of these e-mail                  
          communications.  Petitioner claimed she had oral agreements                 
          regarding fee arrangements with her clients.                                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007